378
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: − − ==Why has this article been locked?== − − Why has this article been locked? So far as I know, it is not under attack, and so doesn't need protection. Is this yet another effort to prevent ideas other than those of Admin - even alternative ''Christian'' views - getting an airing? For example, the phrase 'fourth century' should in fact read 'second century' (I should know -- I wrote it!). And the Bible ''doesn't'' require belief in Jesus Christ as one's ''personal'' Lord and Saviour -- whatever other kind of Lord and Saviour it might require, and whatever further ideas evangelicals might care to read into it. This is getting rather like the old Vatican! When are the trials for heresy going to begin? --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 06:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
→Why has this article been locked?
==Note==
==Note==
Excuse me, but is that really a fair assumption? I'm also pretty sure that Judaism is the source of both Islam and Christianity, but those two aren't actually connected to each other. But I could be wrong. Either way, it also seems to paint Islam in some sort of satanic light. They're just different and probably wrong, not evil.--[[User:Ronnyreg|Ronnyreg]] 22:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Excuse me, but is that really a fair assumption? I'm also pretty sure that Judaism is the source of both Islam and Christianity, but those two aren't actually connected to each other. But I could be wrong. Either way, it also seems to paint Islam in some sort of satanic light. They're just different and probably wrong, not evil.--[[User:Ronnyreg|Ronnyreg]] 22:45, 12 March 2007 (EDT)