51
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + +
File talk:Wikipedia scandals.jpg (view source)
Revision as of 02:25, October 11, 2007
, 02:25, October 11, 2007commenting on RobSmith
::So when we have evidence WP will begin abiding by its own policies, we may be in a position to cut it some slack & give it the benefit of the doubt. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:52, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
::So when we have evidence WP will begin abiding by its own policies, we may be in a position to cut it some slack & give it the benefit of the doubt. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:52, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
:::In the end, you're still making a grand claim without providing any supporting evidence. If I told you that Conservapedia was funneling funds, and I heard it from someone who wanted to remain anonymous, would you believe me? If I made a misleading graph about it, would you consider it gossip and deceit?[[User:ConserveATory|ConserveATory]] 22:25, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
Okay, I'm starting to get confused now! All I want to do is point out two things, then I think I am done:
Okay, I'm starting to get confused now! All I want to do is point out two things, then I think I am done: