Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
File talk:Wikipedia scandals.jpg (view source)
Revision as of 02:26, October 11, 2007
, 02:26, October 11, 2007We don't need to make any conclusions.
And just to clarify, I'm not defending Wikipedia. I just think Conservapedia should be cautious about what it puts out here.
And just to clarify, I'm not defending Wikipedia. I just think Conservapedia should be cautious about what it puts out here.
[[User:Jason|Jason]] 22:14, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Jason|Jason]] 22:14, 10 October 2007 (EDT)
:Let's look at the foundation website link you provided. [http://fundraising.wikimedia.org/en/fundcore/browse/2007]
Month Total in USD [2007]
1 231,519.38
2 78,717.23
3 142,373.43
Let's subtract $100,000 single donation from the 3rd month
1 231,519.38
2 78,717.23
3 42,373.43
Is a trend discernible? Let's step back and look at a longer term trend.
2005 100.00
2006 1,531,890.98
2007 774,218.39
We don't need to make any conclusions. In fact, reporting the Foundations own stats here actually ''gives'' them credibility. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:26, 10 October 2007 (EDT)