Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
Talk:Anderson v. Liberty Lobby (view source)
Revision as of 15:18, November 3, 2007
, 15:18, November 3, 2007reply
*Id. at 249 (and the other "Id"s) - refer to what exactly? (Also, footnotes might help)
*Id. at 249 (and the other "Id"s) - refer to what exactly? (Also, footnotes might help)
I imagine that it'll be faster for Andy to use his knowledge to fix/clarify this than for me to start from scratch with research, so I'm just posting this here. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 11:09, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
I imagine that it'll be faster for Andy to use his knowledge to fix/clarify this than for me to start from scratch with research, so I'm just posting this here. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 11:09, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
: Jenkins, with all due respect, I don't think citations published reports of opinions (477 U.S. 242) or "Id." (short for "Ibid.") require explanation each and every time. Maybe a general entry could address some of your questions. Feel free to create a general FAQ about Court Opinions (use whatever name you think best) and I'd be happy to fill in details. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:18, 3 November 2007 (EDT)