Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + +
→It goes on here: Not exactly
::Or follow the good example of [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Fox/Archive3#Maybe sysops]? [[User:VicTimme|VicTimme]] 17:20, 12 November 2007 (EST)
::Or follow the good example of [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Fox/Archive3#Maybe sysops]? [[User:VicTimme|VicTimme]] 17:20, 12 November 2007 (EST)
:::Obviously it's severely one-sided where you're concerned. You need to stop playing the victim, VicTimme. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 08:34, 13 November 2007 (EST)
:::Obviously it's severely one-sided where you're concerned. You need to stop playing the victim, VicTimme. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 08:34, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Actually, Karajou, I think "Vic" brings up a good point. When is the [[use of force]] appropriate, and when is it "[[bullying]]"? Remember, that for anarchists no use of governmental force is ever appropriate.
Perhaps the key is to settle on a group of mutually agreeable rules. When I taught Sunday School, I propesed (1) No hitting others (2) No grabbing from them (3) No teasing. Very few of the students insisted on an absolute right to hit, grab, or tease - so we had [[consensus]] on the rules. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:22, 13 November 2007 (EST)