nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 17:
Line 17: − +
Smithsonian-Sternberg affair (view source)
Revision as of 09:31, November 15, 2007
, 09:31, November 15, 2007→Sternberg Peer Review Controversy: Spelling
<small>This section is a stub. Please improve on it. This section does not cite its sources.</small>
<small>This section is a stub. Please improve on it. This section does not cite its sources.</small>
Smithsonian and other evolutionary scientists falsely charged that the Meyer paper was not peer reviewed. These allegations led to the misnomer "Sterberg Peer review controversy," which is a hot topic in the evolutionary blogosphere.<!-- This is true, but could be original research. -->
Smithsonian and other evolutionary scientists falsely charged that the Meyer paper was not peer reviewed. These allegations led to the misnomer "Sternberg Peer review controversy," which is a hot topic in the evolutionary blogosphere.<!-- This is true, but could be original research. -->
== References ==
== References ==