Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Links, Category Caps
Line 12: Line 12:  
=== Opinions on the Smithsonian Controversy ===
 
=== Opinions on the Smithsonian Controversy ===
   −
Critics of teaching Intelligent Design (ID) in public schools have long argued that it is unscientific because no intelligent design paper had been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.  David Klinghoffer commented in a Wall Street Journal opinion article:  "Note the circularity: Critics of ID have long argued that the theory was unscientific because it had not been put forward in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.  Now that it has, they argue that it shouldn't have been because it's unscientific."<ref>[[#Sources|Klinghoffer 2005]]</ref>
+
Critics of teaching Intelligent Design (ID) in public schools have long argued that it is unscientific because no intelligent design paper had been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.  [[David Klinghoffer]] commented in a [[Wall Street Journal]] opinion article:  "Note the circularity: Critics of ID have long argued that the theory was unscientific because it had not been put forward in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.  Now that it has, they argue that it shouldn't have been because it's unscientific."<ref>[[#Sources|Klinghoffer 2005]]</ref>
    
== Sternberg Peer Review Controversy ==
 
== Sternberg Peer Review Controversy ==
Line 35: Line 35:  
*[http://www.rsternberg.net/ Dr. Richard Sternberg's website:]
 
*[http://www.rsternberg.net/ Dr. Richard Sternberg's website:]
   −
[[Category: Intelligent design]]
+
[[Category: Intelligent Design]]
 
[[Category: Political pressure on scientists]]
 
[[Category: Political pressure on scientists]]
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu