Critics of teaching Intelligent Design (ID) in public schools have long argued that it is unscientific because no intelligent design paper had been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. David Klinghoffer commented in a Wall Street Journal opinion article: "Note the circularity: Critics of ID have long argued that the theory was unscientific because it had not been put forward in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Now that it has, they argue that it shouldn't have been because it's unscientific."<ref>[[#Sources|Klinghoffer 2005]]</ref>
+
Critics of teaching Intelligent Design (ID) in public schools have long argued that it is unscientific because no intelligent design paper had been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. [[David Klinghoffer]] commented in a [[Wall Street Journal]] opinion article: "Note the circularity: Critics of ID have long argued that the theory was unscientific because it had not been put forward in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Now that it has, they argue that it shouldn't have been because it's unscientific."<ref>[[#Sources|Klinghoffer 2005]]</ref>
== Sternberg Peer Review Controversy ==
== Sternberg Peer Review Controversy ==
Line 35:
Line 35:
*[http://www.rsternberg.net/ Dr. Richard Sternberg's website:]
*[http://www.rsternberg.net/ Dr. Richard Sternberg's website:]