nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60:
Line 60: + + + + + + + + +
Suppression of alternatives to evolution (view source)
Revision as of 12:40, November 15, 2007
, 12:40, November 15, 2007→''Chemistry in Australia'': Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
The outcry against the article by evolutionists, which included effectively calling Ashton a liar, sweepings dismissals of creationism, but little if anything in the way of actual rebuttal, resulted in the RACI removing mention of the article from their web-site.<ref>Walker, 2007</ref>
The outcry against the article by evolutionists, which included effectively calling Ashton a liar, sweepings dismissals of creationism, but little if anything in the way of actual rebuttal, resulted in the RACI removing mention of the article from their web-site.<ref>Walker, 2007</ref>
==== ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' ====
In August 2004<ref>Meyer, 2004. The on-line archives of the magazine list it as June 2004 [http://apt.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-toc&issn=0006-324X&volume=117&issue=2], but this is not considered reliable, as the same source list both of the following two issues as being December 2004.</ref> the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' published a paper by [[Stephen Meyer]]<ref>Meyer, 2004</ref> which gave an overview of Intelligent Design arguments. (See also [[#Richard Sternberg|Richard Sternberg]], above.)
The ensuing outcry, including from people who had not even read the paper, resulted in the [[Biological Society of Washington]] undertaking to never again publish anything about Intelligent Design.
There were claims that the paper had bypassed the peer review process, but these were shown to be false.
The refusal to ever publish on the topic again was not on the grounds of not passing peer review, but in line with the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]'s position that Intelligent Design is not science.<ref>Sternberg</ref><ref>[http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html Statement from the Council of the Biological Society of Washington]</ref><ref>Walker, 2007</ref><ref>Klinghoffer, 1995a</ref>
== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==