Changes

==== ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' ====

==== ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' ====

In August 2004<ref>Meyer, 2004.  The on-line archives of the magazine list it as June 2004 [http://apt.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-toc&issn=0006-324X&volume=117&issue=2], but this is not considered reliable, as the same source list both of the following two issues as being December 2004.</ref> the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' published a paper by [[Stephen Meyer]]<ref>Meyer, 2004</ref> which gave an overview of Intelligent Design arguments.  (See also [[#Richard Sternberg|Richard Sternberg]], above.)

In August 2004<ref>Meyer, 2004.  The on-line archives of the magazine list it as June 2004 [http://apt.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-toc&issn=0006-324X&volume=117&issue=2], but this is not considered reliable, as the same source lists both of the following two issues as being December 2004.</ref> the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' published a paper by [[Stephen Meyer]]<ref>Meyer, 2004</ref> which gave an overview of Intelligent Design arguments.  (See also [[#Richard Sternberg|Richard Sternberg]], above.)

The ensuing outcry, including from people who had not even read the paper, resulted in the [[Biological Society of Washington]] undertaking to never again publish anything about Intelligent Design.

The ensuing outcry, including from people who had not even read the paper, resulted in the [[Biological Society of Washington]] undertaking to never again publish anything about Intelligent Design.

There were claims that the paper had bypassed the peer review process, but these were shown to be false.

There were claims that the paper had bypassed the peer review process, but these were shown to be false.<ref>McVay, 2005</ref>

The refusal to ever publish on the topic again was not on the grounds of not passing peer review, but in line with the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]'s position that Intelligent Design is not science.<ref>Sternberg</ref><ref>[http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html Statement from the Council of the Biological Society of Washington]</ref><ref>Walker, 2007</ref><ref>Klinghoffer, 1995a</ref>

The refusal to ever publish on the topic again was not on the grounds of not passing peer review, but in line with the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]'s position that Intelligent Design is not science.<ref>Sternberg</ref><ref>[http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html Statement from the Council of the Biological Society of Washington]</ref><ref>Walker, 2007</ref><ref>Klinghoffer, 1995a</ref>