Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Essay:Parallels between evolution and global warming (view source)
Revision as of 13:07, November 19, 2007
, 13:07, November 19, 2007The word homophobia is used in the same doublethinking way
When liberals ask, "Do you believe in evolution (or global warming)?" they don't want to entertain any discussion of cause and effect. They just want you to say that you agree with the whole package (and are one of them) or that you disagree (and are therefore some kind of simpleton or bad guy).
When liberals ask, "Do you believe in evolution (or global warming)?" they don't want to entertain any discussion of cause and effect. They just want you to say that you agree with the whole package (and are one of them) or that you disagree (and are therefore some kind of simpleton or bad guy).
==Relation to "Gay Rights" movement==
Another snarl word is ''[[homophobia]]''. Advocates of homosexuality use the term in two ways:
#any opposition to homosexuality (broad sense)
#opposition to homosexuality which is based on a literal [[phobia]]: irrational fear or hatred
==Common tactic==
So the common tactic in all three major liberal issues is:
*Create a term with a general meaning and a specific meaning
*Alternate seamlessly between general and specific usage
The result is that most people blend the general and specific meanings in their minds and are unaware of the contradiction; see Orwell's [[doublethink]].
And they say *we* are deceptive!
[[Category:Essay]]
[[Category:Essay]]