46
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Talk:Private property (view source)
Revision as of 20:48, November 19, 2007
, 20:48, November 19, 2007no edit summary
I also deleted a couple of sentences that erroneously suggested that private property cannot be held by more than one person. In fact, there are several kinds of joint property recognized in Anglo-American law. I suspect the author meant to distinguish private ownership from, for example, nationalized property, which, in theory, is owned by the public at large, which, of course, is a valid distinction, but the statement as written was inaccurate. [[User:QBeam]] 3:45 EST, Nov. 19, 2007
I also deleted a couple of sentences that erroneously suggested that private property cannot be held by more than one person. In fact, there are several kinds of joint property recognized in Anglo-American law. I suspect the author meant to distinguish private ownership from, for example, nationalized property, which, in theory, is owned by the public at large, which, of course, is a valid distinction, but the statement as written was inaccurate. [[User:QBeam]] 3:45 EST, Nov. 19, 2007
: Oops, I just realized that my cut-and-pasting didn't copy in the footnotes. I'm out of time at this minute, but I'll add them shortly...bear with me.