Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,101 bytes added ,  22:33, November 19, 2007
no edit summary
Line 37: Line 37:     
--[[User:Jetgraphics|Jetgraphics]] 16:43, 19 November 2007 (EST)
 
--[[User:Jetgraphics|Jetgraphics]] 16:43, 19 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
== WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? ==
 +
 +
 +
DOMINION - Generally accepted definition of "dominion" is perfect
 +
control in right of ownership. The word implies both title and
 +
possession and appears to require a complete retention of control over
 +
disposition. -Sovereignty; as the
 +
dominion of the seas or over a territory.
 +
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.486
 +
 +
SOVEREIGN - "...Having undisputed right to make decisions and act
 +
accordingly".
 +
New Webster's Dictionary And Thesaurus, p. 950.
 +
 +
SOVEREIGN - A person, body or state in which independent and supreme
 +
authority is vested...
 +
Black's Law Dictionary Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1395.
 +
 +
SOVEREIGNTY - ...By "Sovereignty", in its largest sense is meant
 +
supreme, absolute, uncontrollable power, the absolute right to govern.
 +
Black's Law Dictionary Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1396.
 +
 +
WHO IS SOVEREIGN?
 +
 +
"Government is not Sovereignty. Government is the machinery or
 +
expedient for expressing the will of the sovereign power."
 +
City of Bisbee v. Cochise County,
 +
78 P. 2d 982, 986, 52 Ariz. 1
 +
 +
"People are supreme, not the state."
 +
Waring v. the Mayor of Savanah, 60 GA at 93.
 +
 +
"The people of the state, as the successors of its former sovereign,
 +
are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the king by
 +
his own prerogative."
 +
Lansing v. Smith, (1829) 4 Wendell 9, (NY)
 +
 +
"At the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people and they
 +
are truly the sovereigns of the country."
 +
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, 463
 +
 +
These citations show that the servant government recognizes that American people are sovereign over government. And sovereignty and property are inseparable. A king without land is merely a traveling prince.
 +
 +
We can infer that for an individual to exercise his sovereign prerogatives, he must absolutely own his domain. That is why it is a common error to presume that joint ownership or any other form of collective ownership fits with "private property".
 +
In fact, any other form of ownership that is NOT absolute nor by an individual is NOT private property.
 +
--[[User:Jetgraphics|Jetgraphics]] 17:33, 19 November 2007 (EST)
104

edits

Navigation menu