Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:     
:It's really quite clever how they made this argument. It's parallel to the "[[homophobia]]" scam: irrational reasoning and arguments based on "hate" should be disregarded because they are nonsensical. Opposition to homosexuality is a [[phobia]], i.e., an irrational fear or hatred. Therefore, opposition to homosexuality is nonsensical. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:21, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 
:It's really quite clever how they made this argument. It's parallel to the "[[homophobia]]" scam: irrational reasoning and arguments based on "hate" should be disregarded because they are nonsensical. Opposition to homosexuality is a [[phobia]], i.e., an irrational fear or hatred. Therefore, opposition to homosexuality is nonsensical. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:21, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 +
::Actually, when you put it that way it sounds quite reasonable.  Why do you say that it is a scam?  That is to say: where is the logical flaw?  --[[User:Gridley|Gridley]] 23:25, 20 November 2007 (EST)
16

edits

Navigation menu