6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0923080.html], one of the lowest crime rates. [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/macrime.htm], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm], one of the lowest murder rates [http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=169&scid=12] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST)+ − ::This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. [[User:DDG|DDG]] 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT) − − == Do we really need this article == − − I am very conservative but I don't see a need for this article. Why not simply include it in the MA article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)conservative − − -I agree. Only the first four words are relevant to the article title. The stats belong in the MA article. [[User:Bomber23k|Bomber23k]]
Talk:Massachusetts liberal (view source)
Revision as of 00:02, November 24, 2007
, 00:02, November 24, 2007Replacing page with 'COCKSCOCKSCOCKS RIGHT IN MY MOUTH NUM NUM NUMMY'
COCKSCOCKSCOCKS RIGHT IN MY MOUTH NUM NUM NUMMY