Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − COCKSCOCKSCOCKS RIGHT IN MY MOUTH NUM NUM NUMMY+ + + + + + + +
Talk:Massachusetts liberal (view source)
Revision as of 00:03, November 24, 2007
, 00:03, November 24, 2007Reverted edits by Blessthismess (Talk); changed back to last version by Lensboy
So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0923080.html], one of the lowest crime rates. [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/macrime.htm], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm], one of the lowest murder rates [http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=169&scid=12] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST)
::This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. [[User:DDG|DDG]] 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
== Do we really need this article ==
I am very conservative but I don't see a need for this article. Why not simply include it in the MA article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
-I agree. Only the first four words are relevant to the article title. The stats belong in the MA article. [[User:Bomber23k|Bomber23k]]