nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 156:
Line 156: + + − + + +
no edit summary
::* If you are happy to cooperate then do so. What you have been doing skirts away from cooperation. I see grandstanding even now "None of my (sentences) were kept in your reversions" "I saw nothing wrong inserting bits from other articles that are already on CP. Sorry if that was wrong..."
::* If you are happy to cooperate then do so. What you have been doing skirts away from cooperation. I see grandstanding even now "None of my (sentences) were kept in your reversions" "I saw nothing wrong inserting bits from other articles that are already on CP. Sorry if that was wrong..."
:::That is not grandstanding, that is an observation.
:::That is not grandstanding, that is an observation.
:::* No, it is drama. For instance you were already well aware that I incorporated your additions of the Treaty of Versailles and the Weimar Republic. So instead of you acknowledging that, you try to play games by making the stating that none of your sentences were kept in the reversion, as I changed some words instead of copying your sentences directly. While that is very WP, it will not be tolerated here. Your statement below that also comes across as melodramatic. Be aware that since you have been sufficiently warned, that if I see any attempt in the future to circumvent actual cooperation with more of the same drama, I will take action to prevent any repeat of the same nonproductive and misleading tactics. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:11, 29 November 2007 (EST)
::* What bothers me that I am not sure you see, is that in the end the article will look pretty much like it would have without all of the theatrics. If you presented your views at the start in talk the end result would have been arrived at far quicker and with far less work. Please remember that method for the future. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:15, 28 November 2007 (EST)
::* What bothers me that I am not sure you see, is that in the end the article will look pretty much like it would have without all of the theatrics. If you presented your views at the start in talk the end result would have been arrived at far quicker and with far less work. Please remember that method for the future. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:15, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::Its good to see that it was a waste of time to flat out revert the entire piece, and that it is indeed more profitable to cooperate.
:::Its good to see that it was a waste of time to flat out revert the entire piece, and that it is indeed more profitable to cooperate.
:::* Why don't you try a little test. Go to an article where Andy has just inserted a section and change it all around on him without discussion first except to say that you did it. Do you want to guess what the results would be? If you are going to go out of your way to cause trouble, then you will bear the consequences of your actions. You are well aware now of proper editing technique. If it is not something you feel you can adhere to, then there is another pedia that revels in that type of action where you could feel more at home. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:11, 29 November 2007 (EST)
Perhaps one (or both?) of you need(s) to reread [[Help:Editing Etiquette|Editing Etiquette]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:37, 27 November 2007 (EST)
Perhaps one (or both?) of you need(s) to reread [[Help:Editing Etiquette|Editing Etiquette]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:37, 27 November 2007 (EST)