nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 163:
Line 163: + + +
no edit summary
::::First, I didn't revert your changes, nor did I change it all around, I started from them. Ask somebody you trust to compare the version I quote above, and simply to count the number of phrases in your version that made it into the following version. And I have worked with Andy on articles in the past, and it never happened that he reverted some changes without giving reasons that referred to the actual content of the changes. [[User:Order|Order]] 08:02, 29 November 2007 (EST)
::::First, I didn't revert your changes, nor did I change it all around, I started from them. Ask somebody you trust to compare the version I quote above, and simply to count the number of phrases in your version that made it into the following version. And I have worked with Andy on articles in the past, and it never happened that he reverted some changes without giving reasons that referred to the actual content of the changes. [[User:Order|Order]] 08:02, 29 November 2007 (EST)
:::::Why would I have someone look at the versions above when that wasn't what I originally reverted? And that is exactly the type of thing that bothers me. We aren't about grandstanding or slights of hand. We work as a team here. If you make alterations that aren't accepted then you move to discussion. Due to the volume and tone of your original edit, it was not unexpected that it could be controversial. When you had it confirmed, explanation in the talk section is in order, especially since I specifically requested you to do so in my original reverting. <blockquote>(Removed all mention of the exchange rate dropping to 1 trillion to the dollar? If you want to rewrite the section, take it to talk first)</blockquote>Trying to force back through your changes without first working together was inappropriate. I am pleased we reached an eventual accommodation, but the method used is counterproductive and not the preferred one. I wish to reiterate again that I am not questioning your knowledge. I believe that you could and did bring constructive information to the table and I hope you will do so again, but in a form that respects long term editors and what we can bring to the table as well. Thank you [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 01:19, 30 November 2007 (EST)
Perhaps one (or both?) of you need(s) to reread [[Help:Editing Etiquette|Editing Etiquette]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:37, 27 November 2007 (EST)
Perhaps one (or both?) of you need(s) to reread [[Help:Editing Etiquette|Editing Etiquette]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:37, 27 November 2007 (EST)