104
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + +
Talk:Transgender activism (view source)
Revision as of 21:34, December 7, 2007
, 21:34, December 7, 2007Sex ed should not be given on Conservapedia. In order to detail the distinctions of the groups mentioned requires an invasive presentation of sexual information.
:Really? What does any of this have to do with Conservapedia:Commandment 2:
:Really? What does any of this have to do with Conservapedia:Commandment 2:
:*''Edits/new pages must be family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language. '' [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:54, 6 December 2007 (EST)
:*''Edits/new pages must be family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language. '' [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:54, 6 December 2007 (EST)
:I really can't see a reasonable justification for this. While the distinctions given exist, providing an article for each would be covering far too in-depth a sexual topic. It is a common value of conservatives that sex-education should only be provided by the parent. Covering GID, and transgender activism is one thing, however going into depth about what distinguishes a cross-dresser from a transsexual is far too invasive into the territory of sex ed. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 16:34, 7 December 2007 (EST)