Changes

:::The edit in question was this:  "The banana's useful design is seen by some as offering evidence of an [[intelligent design]]er.<ref>http://ecclesia.org/truth/atheist.html</ref> ''Evolutionists point out that the banana did indeed have an intelligent designer, man, who cultivated..."'' (his edit in italics).  I found it to be a mild mockery of the article.  It could have been written a bit better than that, such as "evolutionists believe that the banana was cultivated by man some ten thousand years ago...", and I would encourage him to do so.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:02, 19 December 2007 (EST)

:::The edit in question was this:  "The banana's useful design is seen by some as offering evidence of an [[intelligent design]]er.<ref>http://ecclesia.org/truth/atheist.html</ref> ''Evolutionists point out that the banana did indeed have an intelligent designer, man, who cultivated..."'' (his edit in italics).  I found it to be a mild mockery of the article.  It could have been written a bit better than that, such as "evolutionists believe that the banana was cultivated by man some ten thousand years ago...", and I would encourage him to do so.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:02, 19 December 2007 (EST)