User talk:Jeffsang

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sarcastic or silly edits will result in a removal from the site. Please refrain from doing so. Karajou 14:17, 19 December 2007 (EST)

While reviewing his edit, it was in complete earnest, and not a sarcastic or silly edit, quoting a liberal source as a reference should simply be not allowed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Puellanivis (talk)
I agree that the edit wasn't sarcastic or silly. (Though I hope Peullanavis' comment about disallowing liberal sources was...) HelpJazz 14:49, 19 December 2007 (EST)
Sorry, I clarify, the source is a liberal non-American site from a "science" foundation. Such material that contradicts the Bible is inappropriate for CP. --Puellanivis 14:58, 19 December 2007 (EST)
The edit in question was this: "The banana's useful design is seen by some as offering evidence of an intelligent designer.[1] Evolutionists point out that the banana did indeed have an intelligent designer, man, who cultivated..." (his edit in italics). I found it to be a mild mockery of the article. It could have been written a bit better than that, such as "evolutionists believe that the banana was cultivated by man some ten thousand years ago...", and I would encourage him to do so. Karajou 15:02, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Non-American has nothing to do with the Bible. Are you a parodist? DanH 15:07, 19 December 2007 (EST)

I'm suspicious as well, Dan... .according to the guidelines, there's nothing wrong with "non-American" sources (which this wasn't) or sources which "contradict the Bible" (which this doesn't really), so long as they are properly attributed (which the statement was). HelpJazz 15:13, 19 December 2007 (EST)