Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + + + +
User talk:Physicsnut (view source)
Revision as of 23:01, December 19, 2007
, 23:01, December 19, 2007reversion explained
==Unblock==
==Unblock==
I'm going to change my mind on this; your physics contributions were of a nature of one trying to build some good entries...but please, instead of rants, please contact Aschlafly and explain your misgivings. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:45, 19 December 2007 (EST)
I'm going to change my mind on this; your physics contributions were of a nature of one trying to build some good entries...but please, instead of rants, please contact Aschlafly and explain your misgivings. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:45, 19 December 2007 (EST)
== Reversion explained ==
Physicsnut, your comment for your changes is to protect [[Robert Dicke]], but in fact your changes do nothing of the sort. Rather, your changes seem designed to protect the undeserved prestige of the [[Nobel Prize]], at [[Robert Dicke]]'s expense. Moreover, your change made the sentence incoherent, indicating that you are placing ideology over accuracy here. Hence I reverted it. You can explain further here and explore if a compromise is possible while preserving the insights and accuracy of the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:01, 19 December 2007 (EST)