32
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + +
User talk:Physicsnut (view source)
Revision as of 00:53, December 20, 2007
, 00:53, December 20, 2007→Reversion explained: Robert was a great man
Physicsnut, your comment for your changes is to protect [[Robert Dicke]], but in fact your changes do nothing of the sort. Rather, your changes seem designed to protect the undeserved prestige of the [[Nobel Prize]], at [[Robert Dicke]]'s expense. Moreover, your change made the sentence incoherent, indicating that you are placing ideology over accuracy here. Hence I reverted it. You can explain further here and explore if a compromise is possible while preserving the insights and accuracy of the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:01, 19 December 2007 (EST)
Physicsnut, your comment for your changes is to protect [[Robert Dicke]], but in fact your changes do nothing of the sort. Rather, your changes seem designed to protect the undeserved prestige of the [[Nobel Prize]], at [[Robert Dicke]]'s expense. Moreover, your change made the sentence incoherent, indicating that you are placing ideology over accuracy here. Hence I reverted it. You can explain further here and explore if a compromise is possible while preserving the insights and accuracy of the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:01, 19 December 2007 (EST)
: I am indifferent about the Nobel Prize. However, Calling Robert (You can call him Professor Dicke) "outspoken" and "hurt professionally" is an assault on a great man, recognized by all as a great man. [[User:Physicsnut|Physicsnut]] 19:53, 19 December 2007 (EST)