nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
675
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + +
Talk:Evangelical atheist (view source)
Revision as of 04:01, January 1, 2008
, 04:01, January 1, 2008no edit summary
::::::::: You're asking questions that have nothing to do with the entry and which I don't have an answer to. The entry simply states, "denying any correlation between crime, depression, anxiety, immorality, insanity and rejection of Christianity." How do you get to Hindus and Buddhists from there, most of whom have not rejected Christianity and few of whom reside in the West??? It seems you're playing some type of politically correct game that has no place on Conservapedia. I'd guess you're someone who rejects central tenets of Christianity, but you won't even address your own belief and instead want to discuss the beliefs of a tiny fraction of the West. Frankly, you seem to be wasting my time at this point and I'm going to move on to other issues soon unless you want to focus on what the entry actually says and where you are coming from.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)
::::::::: You're asking questions that have nothing to do with the entry and which I don't have an answer to. The entry simply states, "denying any correlation between crime, depression, anxiety, immorality, insanity and rejection of Christianity." How do you get to Hindus and Buddhists from there, most of whom have not rejected Christianity and few of whom reside in the West??? It seems you're playing some type of politically correct game that has no place on Conservapedia. I'd guess you're someone who rejects central tenets of Christianity, but you won't even address your own belief and instead want to discuss the beliefs of a tiny fraction of the West. Frankly, you seem to be wasting my time at this point and I'm going to move on to other issues soon unless you want to focus on what the entry actually says and where you are coming from.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)
::::::::::Now you're just being willfully obtuse. The article states that evangelical atheists claim that people can be good without attending services or reading the Bible, so presumably you believe this to be false and that people can only be good if they attend services and read the Bible. Clearly, non-Christians do not read the Bible or attend services, so if this is the case, are non-Christians capable of being good. This seems a fairly straightforward question that you have dodged repeatedly. The same is the case for "denying any correlation between crime, depression, anxiety, immorality, insanity and rejection of Christianity." Well, non-Christians obviously reject Christianity, so where is the evidence that they are more likely to suffer from any of the above things? [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 23:01, 31 December 2007 (EST)
With your knowledge of the Bible, it seems you'd have a copy handy to look up my reference, Leviticus 25, which is the part that endorses slavery. Other a few cases at [[young mass murderers]], which I notice were almost all listed by you, you haven't shown any correlation between following other religions and murderous tendencies. Though, if you were to find some good sources supporting it, it'd be more convincing. After all, isn't it one of the Commandments that's listed for this website to cite sources?
With your knowledge of the Bible, it seems you'd have a copy handy to look up my reference, Leviticus 25, which is the part that endorses slavery. Other a few cases at [[young mass murderers]], which I notice were almost all listed by you, you haven't shown any correlation between following other religions and murderous tendencies. Though, if you were to find some good sources supporting it, it'd be more convincing. After all, isn't it one of the Commandments that's listed for this website to cite sources?