| | ::::::::::Now you're just being willfully obtuse. The article states that evangelical atheists claim that people can be good without attending services or reading the Bible, so presumably you believe this to be false and that people can only be good if they attend services and read the Bible. Clearly, non-Christians do not read the Bible or attend services, so if this is the case, are non-Christians capable of being good. This seems a fairly straightforward question that you have dodged repeatedly. The same is the case for "denying any correlation between crime, depression, anxiety, immorality, insanity and rejection of Christianity." Well, non-Christians obviously reject Christianity, so where is the evidence that they are more likely to suffer from any of the above things? [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 23:01, 31 December 2007 (EST) | | ::::::::::Now you're just being willfully obtuse. The article states that evangelical atheists claim that people can be good without attending services or reading the Bible, so presumably you believe this to be false and that people can only be good if they attend services and read the Bible. Clearly, non-Christians do not read the Bible or attend services, so if this is the case, are non-Christians capable of being good. This seems a fairly straightforward question that you have dodged repeatedly. The same is the case for "denying any correlation between crime, depression, anxiety, immorality, insanity and rejection of Christianity." Well, non-Christians obviously reject Christianity, so where is the evidence that they are more likely to suffer from any of the above things? [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 23:01, 31 December 2007 (EST) |
| | + | ::::::::::: SSchultz, your comments are illogical and I'm going to stop wasting time in replying, and expect you to insist on [[last wordism]]. The entry refers to "religious services," which of course is not limited to [[Christians]]. The entry does not, and I've explained on this talk page that it does not, claim that "people can only be good if they attend services and read the Bible." The entry is correct as stated, obviously a bit too insightful for the liking of some. Such is the purpose of Conservapedia. Have the last word as I'm sure you will insist. I'm moving on to other issues.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:06, 31 December 2007 (EST) |
| | With your knowledge of the Bible, it seems you'd have a copy handy to look up my reference, Leviticus 25, which is the part that endorses slavery. Other a few cases at [[young mass murderers]], which I notice were almost all listed by you, you haven't shown any correlation between following other religions and murderous tendencies. Though, if you were to find some good sources supporting it, it'd be more convincing. After all, isn't it one of the Commandments that's listed for this website to cite sources? | | With your knowledge of the Bible, it seems you'd have a copy handy to look up my reference, Leviticus 25, which is the part that endorses slavery. Other a few cases at [[young mass murderers]], which I notice were almost all listed by you, you haven't shown any correlation between following other religions and murderous tendencies. Though, if you were to find some good sources supporting it, it'd be more convincing. After all, isn't it one of the Commandments that's listed for this website to cite sources? |