272
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: +
Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (view source)
Revision as of 22:35, January 13, 2008
, 22:35, January 13, 2008→Possibly
:I'll accept your well-phrased challenge. I've noticed the stub problem myself.
:I'll accept your well-phrased challenge. I've noticed the stub problem myself.
:As far as I know, the only forbidden subjects on Conservapedia are those that might primarily appeal to a prurient interest--about which, I trust nothing further need be said.
:As far as I know, the only forbidden subjects on Conservapedia are those that might primarily appeal to a prurient interest--about which, I trust nothing further need be said.
:I agree with [[User:Fingermouse|Fingermouse]]; however, having started as a Wikipedia reader, then editing Wikipedia as a minor hobby, then getting frustrated and coming here, unfortunately I find myself just adding stubby material myself. [[User:Npov2|Npov2]] 17:35, 13 January 2008 (EST)
:What sort of mythology are you strong in? Classical? Nordic? Chinese?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 20:00, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:What sort of mythology are you strong in? Classical? Nordic? Chinese?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 20:00, 10 April 2007 (EDT)