133
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 117:
Line 117: + +
Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (view source)
Revision as of 02:27, March 15, 2008
, 02:27, March 15, 2008→Yes:: I think Conservapedia is already succeeding
:Has CreationWiki "succeeded?" At what? In terms of press mentions and Alexa rank, it could be argued that Conservapedia is, at the moment, more successful than CreationWiki. (Incidentally, do people have any theories about the apparent spike in activity that Alexa shows for CreationWiki around the beginning of March?[http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=www.creationwiki.org&url=www.creationwiki.org]). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:45, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:Has CreationWiki "succeeded?" At what? In terms of press mentions and Alexa rank, it could be argued that Conservapedia is, at the moment, more successful than CreationWiki. (Incidentally, do people have any theories about the apparent spike in activity that Alexa shows for CreationWiki around the beginning of March?[http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=www.creationwiki.org&url=www.creationwiki.org]). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:45, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
:I think Conservapedia is already succeeding.... [[User:Pandeism|Pandeism]] 22:27, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
== No: ==
== No: ==