5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + +
Talk:Homosexuality and Scotland (view source)
Revision as of 01:40, January 14, 2008
, 01:40, January 14, 2008→Erm, what?
I will edit this page to remove the unproven allegation of a homosexual conspiracy, and the things that would be irrelevant to this conspiracy, even if it exists. If anyone can actually come up with a reasonable answer to any of the above questions, feel free to re-add the relevant parts. I've also removed what seems to be the same thing being said twice in the list of bullet points. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 17:59, 13 January 2008 (EST)
I will edit this page to remove the unproven allegation of a homosexual conspiracy, and the things that would be irrelevant to this conspiracy, even if it exists. If anyone can actually come up with a reasonable answer to any of the above questions, feel free to re-add the relevant parts. I've also removed what seems to be the same thing being said twice in the list of bullet points. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 17:59, 13 January 2008 (EST)
:::I have other things to do, so this is a blatent 'sockpuppet' created to make this point. I edit this page, as described above, then this edit is reverted in minutes, quoting a rule about 'not deleting cited claims without getting permission on the talk page', which, as far as I can see, has been created on the spot for the purposes of enabling the sysops to revert my edit, plus, of course, all bar one of the 'cited claims' are totally and utterly irrelevant in any way to the subject of homosexuality and Scotland, and this one relevant claim is disproved by the very source it cites. I revert the reversion, giving this as the reason in the summary box, so this gets reverted again, and I am blocked, being told to 'cool down'. I can only conclude from this that Conservapedia has zero interest in it's pages being factually accurate and relevant to the subject the page is supposed to be about. [[User:Zmidponk2|Zmidponk2]] 20:40, 13 January 2008 (EST)