Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + − + + +
fixed cats, added more
In, ''Springer v. Henry'', 435 F.3d 268, 271 (3d Cir. 2006), the Court of Appeals for the [[Third Circuit]] upheld a million-dollar judgment against a Delaware psychiatric for retaliating against a staff physician for exercising his [[First Amendment]] rights in criticizing patient care at the State hospital.
In, ''Springer v. Henry'', 435 F.3d 268, 271 (3d Cir. 2006), the Court of Appeals for the [[Third Circuit]] upheld a million-dollar jury award against a Delaware psychiatric for retaliating against a staff physician for exercising his [[First Amendment]] rights in criticizing patient care at the State hospital.
This decision was extraordinary in affirming a large award by a physician against a state governmental entity.
This decision was extraordinary in affirming a large award by a physician against a state governmental entity.
[[Category:Law]]
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
[[category:First Amendment]]
[[category:Section 1983]]