Changes

==Challenge==

==Challenge==

I tried to talk about this to Learn Together on his user talk page, but for some reason either he didn't have time or he didn't want to talk. Nonetheless, I feel it's a relatively important issue, so... Learn together is occasionally giving himself four points if he makes what he considers a good enough minor edit, despite the fact that it would seem that no such allowance exists in the rules. Now granted, he's also cutting himself short by occasionally giving himself one point. Given that the contest is almost over - and it would be hard for users to go back and change everything, I would like to propose that all minor edits be worth exactly 2 points, and all quality edits be worth 6, and then perhaps after the contest we could discuss a "regular edit" type thing. Judges?--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 22:03, 19 January 2008 (EST)

I tried to talk about this to Learn Together on his user talk page, but for some reason either he didn't have time or he didn't want to talk. Nonetheless, I feel it's a relatively important issue, so... Learn together is occasionally giving himself four points if he makes what he considers a good enough minor edit, despite the fact that it would seem that no such allowance exists in the rules. Now granted, he's also cutting himself short by occasionally giving himself one point. Given that the contest is almost over - and it would be hard for users to go back and change everything, I would like to propose that all minor edits be worth exactly 2 points, and all quality edits be worth 6, and then perhaps after the contest we could discuss a "regular edit" type thing. Judges?--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 22:03, 19 January 2008 (EST)