Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 68: Line 68:     
Citing to "bloodletting" as an example of science's major failures is beyond ridiculous, and using it as proof of how fluctual science is, well, that's even worse.  Honestly, I don't know why [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] is an admin; the edits here are shockingly bad.  Can an unbiased admin have a crack at this article...
 
Citing to "bloodletting" as an example of science's major failures is beyond ridiculous, and using it as proof of how fluctual science is, well, that's even worse.  Honestly, I don't know why [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] is an admin; the edits here are shockingly bad.  Can an unbiased admin have a crack at this article...
 +
::Medical science is part of science. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:56, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
    
PLEASE?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:01, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
PLEASE?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:01, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,907

edits

Navigation menu