Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 68:
Line 68: + + + − PLEASE?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:01, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 06:57, March 15, 2007
, 06:57, March 15, 2007→This article is a travesty
Citing to "bloodletting" as an example of science's major failures is beyond ridiculous, and using it as proof of how fluctual science is, well, that's even worse. Honestly, I don't know why [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] is an admin; the edits here are shockingly bad. Can an unbiased admin have a crack at this article...
Citing to "bloodletting" as an example of science's major failures is beyond ridiculous, and using it as proof of how fluctual science is, well, that's even worse. Honestly, I don't know why [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] is an admin; the edits here are shockingly bad. Can an unbiased admin have a crack at this article...
PLEASE?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:01, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
::Medical science is part of science. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:56, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
::Medical science is part of science. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:56, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
:Alchemy is wrong? Well there goes the hope of hot fusion![[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:05, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
:Alchemy is wrong? Well there goes the hope of hot fusion![[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 17:05, 14 March 2007 (EDT)