5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − + − +
Debate:Are there any conservatives left in the Republican Party? (view source)
Revision as of 16:31, January 24, 2008
, 16:31, January 24, 2008no edit summary
::That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
::That's fallacious. Whether somebody personally believes the science behind global warming or not does not necessarily affect their political opinions per se, or even how they approach the issue of environmentalism. That being said, I'd say one of the most conservative Congressmen is Jeff Flake (R,AZ). [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
:::LOL. "Science behind global warming." Hehehehehe. That's a great liberal parody. You're funny. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 01:35, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:::LOL. "Science behind global warming." Hehehehehe. That's a great liberal parody. You're funny. <font style="background-color:#121298; color:white;">SW</font><sup>[[User:StephenW|♠]]·[[User_talk:StephenW|♥]]·[[Special:Contributions/StephenW|♣]]</sup> 01:35, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:I mean the science behind the theory, or whatever it is. You know what I mean. I'm not a liberal parodist. I find that really insulting. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:41, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:I mean the science behind the theory, or whatever it is. You know what I mean. I'm not a liberal parodist. I find that really insulting. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:41, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::There is a ton of "science behind global warming", and even Richard Lindzon agrees with that statement. It's rather ignorant to say otherwise. At any rate, politicians are not scientists, so Dan's right -- it doesn't matter if they actually know what's going on, that's the scientist's job. It matters what they will do or not do about it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:30, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::There is a ton of "science behind global warming", and even Richard Lindzon agrees with that statement. (StephenW you aren't a "conservative parodist" are you? Nobody likes to be called names.) It's rather ignorant to say otherwise. At any rate, politicians are not scientists, so Dan's right -- it doesn't matter if they actually know what's going on, that's the scientist's job. It matters what they will do or not do about it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:30, 24 January 2008 (EST)