133
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
Debate:Are there any conservatives left in the Republican Party? (view source)
Revision as of 02:25, March 15, 2008
, 02:25, March 15, 2008The Republican Party has swung '''''very''''' liberal.... big spending, even tax increases (although subtle and targetted)
:I mean the science behind the theory, or whatever it is. You know what I mean. I'm not a liberal parodist. I find that really insulting. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:41, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:I mean the science behind the theory, or whatever it is. You know what I mean. I'm not a liberal parodist. I find that really insulting. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:41, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::There is a ton of "science behind global warming", and even Richard Lindzon agrees with that statement. (StephenW you aren't a "conservative parodist" are you? Nobody likes to be called names.) It's rather ignorant to say otherwise. At any rate, politicians are not scientists, so Dan's right -- it doesn't matter if they actually know what's going on, that's the scientist's job. It matters what they will do or not do about it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:30, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::There is a ton of "science behind global warming", and even Richard Lindzon agrees with that statement. (StephenW you aren't a "conservative parodist" are you? Nobody likes to be called names.) It's rather ignorant to say otherwise. At any rate, politicians are not scientists, so Dan's right -- it doesn't matter if they actually know what's going on, that's the scientist's job. It matters what they will do or not do about it. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:30, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:The Republican Party has swung '''''very''''' liberal.... big spending, even tax increases (although subtle and targetted).... [[User:Pandeism|Pandeism]] 22:25, 14 March 2008 (EDT)