117
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: +
Talk:Video game controversy (view source)
Revision as of 22:24, January 27, 2008
, 22:24, January 27, 2008no edit summary
:::::::::I don't agree that Eternal Forces should be pulled, nor do I think GTA should. But really, when you buy a game with a crime as it's name, do you expect fluffy kittens and vanilla skies?
:::::::::I don't agree that Eternal Forces should be pulled, nor do I think GTA should. But really, when you buy a game with a crime as it's name, do you expect fluffy kittens and vanilla skies?
:::::::::Aside from that: Yes, because it was only liberals saying this and not concerned Christians. On the same note, no conservative organisation would ever find one minute of [partial nudity] and claim the game was a 30-hour graphic sex simulator. Definately not Fox vs. Mass Effect. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:43, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::::Aside from that: Yes, because it was only liberals saying this and not concerned Christians. On the same note, no conservative organisation would ever find one minute of [partial nudity] and claim the game was a 30-hour graphic sex simulator. Definately not Fox vs. Mass Effect. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:43, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::Actually, I think you'll find that's due to claims of racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry in the game, not the violence (I have not played it myself, so I do not know if these claims are true), and the relative lack of popularity is down to it being...well...not very good, basically. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 17:24, 27 January 2008 (EST)