12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 273:
Line 273: + +
Talk:Liberal hypocrisy (view source)
Revision as of 22:41, January 31, 2008
, 22:41, January 31, 2008→There is no article called [[Conservative hipocricy]]
:LOL. You beat me to it Bohdan. :) I feel bad for you Ardwingore. I know how it feels to believe I had a point... --[[User:David R|◄ Ďāʋĭđ Ŕ ►]] 22:54, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
:LOL. You beat me to it Bohdan. :) I feel bad for you Ardwingore. I know how it feels to believe I had a point... --[[User:David R|◄ Ďāʋĭđ Ŕ ►]] 22:54, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
In my opinion, this article is rather silly. If there is a "Liberal hypocrisy" article, then there should be a "Conservative Hypocrisy" or "Reform Hypocrisy" and a hypocrisy article for every school of thought. To have all of these pointless Liberal topics makes Conservapedia look tawdry. Many people take a look at the Breaking News section and see another example of "liberal deceit" or something (since when is an example of bias in Wikipedia "breaking news"?). You cannot fix a liberal bias by replacing it with a conservative one.
In my opinion, this article is rather silly. If there is a "Liberal hypocrisy" article, then there should be a "Conservative Hypocrisy" or "Reform Hypocrisy" and a hypocrisy article for every school of thought. To have all of these pointless Liberal topics makes Conservapedia look tawdry. Many people take a look at the Breaking News section and see another example of "liberal deceit" or something (since when is an example of bias in Wikipedia "breaking news"?). You cannot fix a liberal bias by replacing it with a conservative one.
There should definitely be an article about conservative hypocrisy, as it is at least as prolific as the liberal version, if not more so. We are all human and subject to the limitations that it implies. By having such an extensive liberal hypocrisy page and not a single murmur on conservative hypocrisy is essentially admitting the already profound bias found in every single article in this pedia. The idea that this pedia isn't ultra-biased is a horrific joke at best
== Edwards again==
== Edwards again==