Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
133 bytes added ,  01:20, February 2, 2008
Line 38: Line 38:     
:::I was thinking of this: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage for example (although I note that it is a few years old).  It concludes that there is no increase in risk.  It seems to me that if the National Cancer Institute says there is no increase in the risk then it is a bit of a stretch to say that it is ''plainly true'' that the risk increase exists.  Surely you can't really call something plainly true when it goes against wht the experts are saying.  --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 00:29, 1 February 2008 (EST)
 
:::I was thinking of this: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/abortion-miscarriage for example (although I note that it is a few years old).  It concludes that there is no increase in risk.  It seems to me that if the National Cancer Institute says there is no increase in the risk then it is a bit of a stretch to say that it is ''plainly true'' that the risk increase exists.  Surely you can't really call something plainly true when it goes against wht the experts are saying.  --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 00:29, 1 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:::So, should we remove the abortion/breast cancer comment from the article?  --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 20:20, 1 February 2008 (EST)
138

edits

Navigation menu