Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Liberal denial (view source)

Revision as of 04:15, February 3, 2008

492 bytes added ,  04:15, February 3, 2008
→‎Abortions and breast cancer: reply
Line 56: Line 56:     
: Curses!  That's exactly what I was going to say.  Aschlafly's argument is utterly misguided.  The woman concerned has the same cancer risk as if she was never pregnant.  Is that an increased risk???  Do we now go and edit the [[abstinence]] page to say that abstinence increases the risk of cancer?  [[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 17:20, 2 February 2008 (EST)
 
: Curses!  That's exactly what I was going to say.  Aschlafly's argument is utterly misguided.  The woman concerned has the same cancer risk as if she was never pregnant.  Is that an increased risk???  Do we now go and edit the [[abstinence]] page to say that abstinence increases the risk of cancer?  [[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 17:20, 2 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:: Nice try folks, but you just continue to prove the point about [[liberal denial]].  Abortion does plainly increase the risk of breast cancer.  The more abortions now, the more cases of breast cancer in the future.  Continue to deny it and thereby continue to demonstrate liberal denial.  As to abstinence, for the unmarried it is the best way to avoid cervical and breast cancer and far better than cancer-causing birth control.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:15, 2 February 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,617

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/383878"

Navigation menu