Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
405 bytes added ,  05:10, February 8, 2008
reply
Line 78: Line 78:     
:::::: In light of this discussion I guess that's what you might call ironic, isn't it?  --[[User:CarolineMilton|CarolineMilton]] 00:04, 8 February 2008 (EST)
 
:::::: In light of this discussion I guess that's what you might call ironic, isn't it?  --[[User:CarolineMilton|CarolineMilton]] 00:04, 8 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::::::: Your hypothetical has no bearing with respect to a woman choosing between having an abortion or carrying the pregnancy to birth.  Factually, by the way, the woman who has the abortion has greater risk of breast cancer.  As to "conservative denial," just suggest it here.  No need for a special page for just one not-yet-made suggestion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:10, 8 February 2008 (EST)
    
==Suggestion for Item 11==
 
==Suggestion for Item 11==
 
That denying any above is intrinsic proof of this list's accuracy, unquestionability, and the need not to offer proof for anything. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 09:52, 4 February 2008 (EST)
 
That denying any above is intrinsic proof of this list's accuracy, unquestionability, and the need not to offer proof for anything. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 09:52, 4 February 2008 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,569

edits

Navigation menu