Changes

==Wikipedia and Bias==

==Wikipedia and Bias==

Though popular Wikipedia has come under harsh criticisms for its [[bias]]. The [[encyclopedia]] is generally very anti-elite, [[liberal]], and anti-[[Christian]]. Examples of its anti-Christian bias include its article on the [[Bible]] where it says "Many people who identify themselves as Christians, [[Muslims]], or [[Jews]] regard the Bible as inspired by [[God]] yet written by a variety of imperfect men over thousands of years"[<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible#Christian_theology]</ref>]. This statement is obvisouly biased against those who know that the [[Bible]] is the literal word of [[God]] and is without flaw.  

Though popular Wikipedia has come under harsh criticisms for its [[bias]]. The [[encyclopedia]] is generally very anti-elite, [[liberal]], and anti-[[Christian]]. Examples of its anti-Christian bias include its article on the [[Bible]] where it says "Many people who identify themselves as Christians, [[Muslims]], or [[Jews]] regard the Bible as inspired by [[God]] yet written by a variety of imperfect men over thousands of years"<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible#Christian_theology]</ref>. This statement is obvisouly biased against those who know that the [[Bible]] is the literal word of [[God]] and is without flaw.  

On that same page about the Bible, Wikipedia includes a lengthy discussion on heathen's who have criticised the Bible. [<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible]</ref>] The opinions expressed in this article are clearly heritcal and anti-[[Christian]].

On that same page about the Bible, Wikipedia includes a lengthy discussion on heathen's who have criticised the Bible. <ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible]</ref> The opinions expressed in this article are clearly heritcal and anti-[[Christian]].

==References==

==References==