433
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − Though popular Wikipedia has come under harsh criticisms for its [[bias]]. The [[encyclopedia]] is generally very anti-elite, [[liberal]], and anti-[[Christian]]. Examples of its anti-Christian bias include its article on the [[Bible]] where it says "Many people who identify themselves as Christians, [[Muslims]], or [[Jews]] regard the Bible as inspired by [[God]] yet written by a variety of imperfect men over thousands of years"<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible#Christian_theology]</ref>. This statement is obvisouly biased against those who know that the [[Bible]] is the literal word of [[God]] and is without flaw. + − On that same page about the Bible, Wikipedia includes a lengthy discussion on heathen's who have criticised the Bible. <ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible]</ref> The opinions expressed in this article are clearly heritcal and anti-[[Christian]].+
reverted back to previous version - if you want to add something, make it factual, not opinon
==Wikipedia and Bias==
==Wikipedia and Bias==
Conservapedia has an article that mimic Wikipedia, though they add a conservative - and often incorrect - spin. Conservapedia is supposedly "solving" the factual bias of Wikipedia, while in truth Conservapedia is actually more Conservatively biased than its so-called "factual" counterpart.
Wikipedia is a flourishing international forum for the full spectrum of ideas.
==References==
==References==