Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
121 bytes added ,  22:13, February 15, 2008
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
What on earth is this tripe supposed to mean? If gun ownership had not been reduced by 0.1% a left wing government (where? how?) would not have been elected? How? By the 0.1% blockading the polling stations with their weaponry? Or is some other 'reason' bubbling away in the peculiar mind of whoever came up with such an argument? [[User:Sawneybeane|Sawneybeane]] 16:20, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
What on earth is this tripe supposed to mean? If gun ownership had not been reduced by 0.1% a left wing government (where? how?) would not have been elected? How? By the 0.1% blockading the polling stations with their weaponry? Or is some other 'reason' bubbling away in the peculiar mind of whoever came up with such an argument? [[User:Sawneybeane|Sawneybeane]] 16:20, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
: It's obvious. [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]]  [[User talk:Ferret|<sub>Nice old chat</sub>]] 17:13, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 +
    
:''"...the largely defensive weapon of gun..."'' I liked that actually! [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 16:55, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
:''"...the largely defensive weapon of gun..."'' I liked that actually! [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 16:55, 15 February 2008 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
875

edits

Navigation menu