Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Liberal logic (view source)

Revision as of 03:55, February 18, 2008

5 bytes removed ,  03:55, February 18, 2008
removed "poor"
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:
 
'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical.  Here are some examples:
   −
# belief that a [[correlation]] (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a poor [[counterexample]] (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
+
# belief that a [[correlation]] (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
 
# [[free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth
 
# [[free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth
 
# insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
 
# insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/390162"

Navigation menu