2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 19:32, February 18, 2008
, 19:32, February 18, 2008no edit summary
I agree, the name(CP0 doesnt seem non biased
I agree, the name(CP0 doesnt seem non biased
How can anyone possibly say that Conservapedia will become as big as Wikipedia? The preface of this site is that it has a Conservative bias. The only problem with Wikipedia is that is can have factually questionably material, but atleast when Wikipedia can't account for the factuality of a page, they put a disclaimer at the top of the page saying that they dont know if the sources are reliable. Conservapedia is biased, and outwardly so. All of the pages have a skew, and all promote one way of viewing the world. There is also a disclaimer that says "use the site at your own risk." At my own risk? I don't want to use an "encyclopedia" that says that there's a risk to using it. That's kind of stupid... The Trustworthy Encyclopedia... ''Give me a break''...