Changes

I agree, the name(CP0 doesnt seem non biased

I agree, the name(CP0 doesnt seem non biased

How can anyone possibly say that Conservapedia will become as big as Wikipedia? The preface of this site is that it has a Conservative bias. The only problem with Wikipedia is that is can have factually questionably material, but atleast when Wikipedia can't account for the factuality of a page, they put a disclaimer at the top of the page saying that they dont know if the sources are reliable. Conservapedia is biased, and outwardly so. All of the pages have a skew, and all promote one way of viewing the world. There is also a disclaimer that says "use the site at your own risk." At my own risk? I don't want to use an "encyclopedia" that says that there's a risk to using it. That's kind of stupid... The Trustworthy Encyclopedia... ''Give me a break''...

How can anyone possibly say that Conservapedia will become as big as Wikipedia? The preface of this site is that it has a Conservative bias. The only problem with Wikipedia is that is can have factually questionably material, but atleast when Wikipedia can't account for the factuality of a page, they put a disclaimer at the top of the page saying that they dont know if the sources are reliable. Conservapedia is biased, and outwardly so. All of the pages have a skew, and all promote one way of viewing the world. There is also a disclaimer that says "use the site at your own risk." At my own risk? I don't want to use an "encyclopedia" that says that there's a risk to using it. That's kind of stupid... The Trustworthy Encyclopedia... ''Give me a break''... '''~AKG~'''