22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 176:
Line 176: + +
Debate:Is President Bush good for America? (view source)
Revision as of 23:55, February 21, 2008
, 23:55, February 21, 2008no edit summary
::::: Yes, that was a problem. Direct democracy does not always produce the best answer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
::::: Yes, that was a problem. Direct democracy does not always produce the best answer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Yet it is the favoured method of the government which vehemently defended South Vietnam. So were they defending South Vietnam against... direct democracy? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:24, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Yet it is the favoured method of the government which vehemently defended South Vietnam. So were they defending South Vietnam against... direct democracy? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:24, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
Excuse me, but whoever said the infighting between Shi'ites and Sunnis is secular is completely ignorant.<br /> Shi'ites and Sunni are two rival sects of Islam.<br /> They have been blood enemies since the death of Mohammed himself, 1300 years ago.<br /> To say that the modern conflict between these two factions is "secular" and thus not about religion is asanine.