22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 177:
Line 177: − +
Debate:Is President Bush good for America? (view source)
Revision as of 00:10, February 22, 2008
, 00:10, February 22, 2008no edit summary
:::::: Yet it is the favoured method of the government which vehemently defended South Vietnam. So were they defending South Vietnam against... direct democracy? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:24, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::: Yet it is the favoured method of the government which vehemently defended South Vietnam. So were they defending South Vietnam against... direct democracy? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:24, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
Excuse me, but whoever said the infighting between Shi'ites and Sunnis is secular is completely ignorant.<br /> Shi'ites and Sunni are two rival sects of Islam.<br /> They have been blood enemies since the death of Mohammed himself, 1300 years ago.<br /> To say that the modern conflict between these two factions is "secular" and thus not about religion is asanine.
Excuse me, but whoever said the infighting between Shi'ites and Sunnis is secular is completely ignorant.<br /> Shi'ites and Sunni are two rival sects of Islam.<br /> They have been blood enemies since the death of Mohammed himself, 1300 years ago.<br /> To say that the modern conflict between these two factions is "secular" and thus not about religion is asanine. [[User:CMacloud|CMacloud]] 19:10, 21 February 2008 (EST)