4,604
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 319:
Line 319: − ::He's definitely not a leading liberal. Evolutionist, though, he is, but I don't think that's enough alone to merit inclusion.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 20:43, 21 February 2008 (EST)
Talk:Essay:Liberal Intellectualism (view source)
Revision as of 07:42, February 22, 2008
, 07:42, February 22, 2008Reverted edits by MexMax (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly
: The point the entry is to show how liberal-promoted intellectuals are not what liberals claim they are. I'm fine with taking Hawking out unless and until someone does more research. He's not a leading [[liberal]] as far as I know, so he probably should not be on the list anyway.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:27, 21 February 2008 (EST)
: The point the entry is to show how liberal-promoted intellectuals are not what liberals claim they are. I'm fine with taking Hawking out unless and until someone does more research. He's not a leading [[liberal]] as far as I know, so he probably should not be on the list anyway.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:27, 21 February 2008 (EST)