16
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
Talk:Transgender activism (view source)
Revision as of 01:48, February 24, 2008
, 01:48, February 24, 2008no edit summary
:A reasonable, accurate treatment of transgender/intersex/transvestism would not be sexual nor family-unfriendly. If we focus on unfounded claims that transgender/transsexuality is some sort of paraphilia, then it will be -- but then, we could write a lot of pages that way and get nowhere in creating an accurate, family-friendly 'pedia. [[User:Mermaid|Gabe]] 12:18, 22 January 2008 (EST)
:A reasonable, accurate treatment of transgender/intersex/transvestism would not be sexual nor family-unfriendly. If we focus on unfounded claims that transgender/transsexuality is some sort of paraphilia, then it will be -- but then, we could write a lot of pages that way and get nowhere in creating an accurate, family-friendly 'pedia. [[User:Mermaid|Gabe]] 12:18, 22 January 2008 (EST)
:If the goal of Conservapedia is to be a more trustworthy encyclopedia than Wikipedia, as well as to have its articles be as educational as it claims, the articles can't be written like this one. There are two sentences on what it is, and then several paragraphs on what conservatives have against it. If Conservapedia is to be either trustworthy or educational, both sides of a controversial argument need to be on the site, or else neither side. [[User:Grapes|Liam Donovan]]