Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Google searches are a USELESS way to compare meaningless terms
Line 45: Line 45:     
I wonder if you thought to exclude all the Google hits that were referring to the Prime "Minister's son" the Finance "Minister's son," and other similar "ministers" when you calculated how much "better" "Minister's sons" (Never mind their daughters, I guess...) were doing then "second-generation atheists." [[User:Aboganza|Aboganza]] 08:57, 26 February 2008 (EST)
 
I wonder if you thought to exclude all the Google hits that were referring to the Prime "Minister's son" the Finance "Minister's son," and other similar "ministers" when you calculated how much "better" "Minister's sons" (Never mind their daughters, I guess...) were doing then "second-generation atheists." [[User:Aboganza|Aboganza]] 08:57, 26 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
==Google Searches are not a way to quantify data==
 +
 +
second generation mushroom=126,000 hits
 +
second generation marshmallow =22,400 hits
 +
 +
Does this tell you anything?  No.  It is utterly, utterly meaningless, like the 'data' presented as 'relevant' in the article.  [[User:Misterlinx|Misterlinx]] 12:28, 26 February 2008 (EST)
64

edits

Navigation menu