Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: + +
Conservapedia talk:Are atheists productive (view source)
Revision as of 00:22, February 29, 2008
, 00:22, February 29, 2008put in quotes
Googling "second generation atheist" gets over 900 hits. Not that it matters because it is <i>google</i>. Really before seeing this page I honestly never have seen the term before. I wonder what exactly is the point of this article? It seems to just be a definition for a rarely used term that anyone with basic English skills would be able to infer. It then makes an unbacked claim based off of "data" made by google in order to insult a broad group of people. I think the whole thing should justed be trashed. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 19:20, 28 February 2008 (EST)
Googling "second generation atheist" gets over 900 hits. Not that it matters because it is <i>google</i>. Really before seeing this page I honestly never have seen the term before. I wonder what exactly is the point of this article? It seems to just be a definition for a rarely used term that anyone with basic English skills would be able to infer. It then makes an unbacked claim based off of "data" made by google in order to insult a broad group of people. I think the whole thing should justed be trashed. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 19:20, 28 February 2008 (EST)
: Put it in quotes, "second generation atheist": only 73 google hits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:22, 28 February 2008 (EST)
== "The Minister's Son" ==
== "The Minister's Son" ==